Tuesday, May 11, 2010

How babies learn: implications for how we tell our story


Used with permission. CC: EraPhernalia


A 2004 study traced the verbal development in 27- and 39-month old boys and girls as a measure of how well they could recall a past event. The researchers found that if the children didn't know the words to describe the event when it happened, they couldn't describe it later after learning the appropriate words [source: Simcock and Hayne].


I found the above quote in an article.

The implications for our work are obvious. Writing, educating, and teaching are instruments of change. If someone can't remember what you said, it can't change them permanently. And even as adults, if the learner can't understand the message, he can't possibly remember the message.

So, do these things:

  1. Talk light. Use a common, small vocabulary.


  2. Talk simple. The old adage about not writing above a 6th grade level may be on to something. Don't use the word adage.


  3. Teach words first. Start with a glossary or primer for anything new or unusual.


Question: What do you do to make sure you can reach your audience?

Comments (3)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
As an English teacher, I understand your point, but as a writer, I use more than a basic vocabulary in what I write. I want my words to sing for my readers. I hoping that those readers will be willing to spread their wings and fly with me.
I agree--to an extent--with the previous commenter. I suggest that one use one's writing as one would use one's speech--you have to know your audience and your subject matter. There are times and places for using a simpler, scaled-down vocabulary; if you're describing how to do something, for example, simple is best. On the other hand, there are some things that cry out for a full range of expression in words, whether the words are big or small.

I use a big vocabulary, not to impress, but because that's how I learned to express myself. I often use words because that's the first word to mind, the only word that fits what I am trying to say. When asked what it means, I have to stop and try to think out how to explain it in simpler words, because no collection of simpler words quite means what that one word expresses. One shouldn't puff up one's writing or speaking, but one shouldn't punch holes in it needlessly, either.
1 reply · active 776 weeks ago
I know what you mean. And I won't deny that I spend a lot of time struggling to pull "that word I'm trying to think of" out of my head, which is normally an "SAT-level" word.

Post a new comment

Comments by